Current:Home > FinanceWisconsin voters are deciding whether to ban private money support for elections -Prosperity Pathways
Wisconsin voters are deciding whether to ban private money support for elections
View
Date:2025-04-18 15:34:17
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Wisconsin voters on Tuesday were deciding on two Republican-backed constitutional amendments, one of which would ban the use of private money to run elections in reaction to grants received in 2020 that were funded by Facebook creator Mark Zuckerberg.
The other proposal would require that only election officials designated by law can administer elections. That is already the law, but adding that language to the Wisconsin Constitution would make it harder to repeal.
Democrats opposed both measures, which they argued would make it more difficult to conduct elections in the presidential battleground state.
Polls are open 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. following an early, in-person absentee voting period that began two weeks ago.
Both proposed constitutional amendments are in response to grant money that came to Wisconsin in 2020 from the Center for Tech and Civic Life, a liberal group that fights for voter access. That year, the center received a $300 million donation from Zuckerberg and his wife Priscilla Chan to help election officials buy supplies and run elections at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic before vaccines were available.
The state’s five largest cities, all of which President Joe Biden won, received $8.8 million. They were among roughly 200 communities in Wisconsin that received around $10 million as part of $350 million given out nationally.
Republicans who dubbed the money “Zuckerbucks” complained the bulk of the funds went to Democratic strongholds and claimed it was an attempt by the billionaire to tip the vote in favor of Democrats. The argument came amid false claims made by former President Donald Trump and his supporters that widespread voter fraud led to Biden’s 2020 win.
Since 2020, Republicans in at least 27 states have outlawed or restricted private elections grants.
The Wisconsin measures are supported by Republicans and conservative groups, including the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty and Election Integrity for Wisconsin. They are opposed by an array of government watchdog and liberal groups including the American Civil Liberties Union, Common Cause Wisconsin, Wisconsin Conservation Voters and the League of Women Voters of Wisconsin.
Not a single Democratic lawmaker voted for the amendment, which was then split into two questions on the ballot. Opponents of the amendments worry they could lead to attempts to stifle current practices enhancing voter participation.
Three courts and the bipartisan Wisconsin Elections Commission rejected complaints challenging the legality of the grant money.
Republicans, who control the Legislature, brought the constitutional amendments to circumvent Democratic Gov. Tony Evers, who almost surely would have vetoed the measures. Amendments are not subject to the governor’s approval.
Wisconsin voters have approved 148 out of 200 proposed constitutional amendments since the state constitution was adopted in 1848, according to the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau.
veryGood! (4999)
Related
- Rams vs. 49ers highlights: LA wins rainy defensive struggle in key divisional game
- Charleston's new International African American Museum turns site of trauma into site of triumph
- NTSB head warns of risks posed by heavy electric vehicles colliding with lighter cars
- Buying an electric car? You can get a $7,500 tax credit, but it won't be easy
- 'Malcolm in the Middle’ to return with new episodes featuring Frankie Muniz
- NOAA’s ‘New Normals’ Climate Data Raises Questions About What’s Normal
- Rain, flooding continue to slam Northeast: The river was at our doorstep
- January is often a big month for layoffs. Here's what to do in a worst case scenario
- Intel's stock did something it hasn't done since 2022
- Having Rolled Back Obama’s Centerpiece Climate Plan, Trump Defends a Vastly More Limited Approach
Ranking
- 'Most Whopper
- Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Part Ways With Spotify
- What Does Net Zero Emissions Mean for Big Oil? Not What You’d Think
- Rally car driver and DC Shoes co-founder Ken Block dies in a snowmobile accident
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- Al Pacino, 83, Welcomes First Baby With Girlfriend Noor Alfallah
- Today's Al Roker Reflects on Health Scares in Emotional Father's Day Tribute
- On Climate, Kamala Harris Has a Record and Profile for Action
Recommendation
Jamie Foxx gets stitches after a glass is thrown at him during dinner in Beverly Hills
Get a $120 Barefoot Dreams Blanket for $30 Before It Sells Out, Again
NOAA’s ‘New Normals’ Climate Data Raises Questions About What’s Normal
Bed Bath & Beyond warns that it may go bankrupt
Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
A Project Runway All-Star Hits on Mentor Christian Siriano in Flirty Season 20 Preview
Q&A: The Sierra Club Embraces Environmental Justice, Forcing a Difficult Internal Reckoning
Step Inside the Pink PJ Party Kim Kardashian Hosted for Daughter North West's 10th Birthday
Like
- Man can't find second winning lottery ticket, sues over $394 million jackpot, lawsuit says
- Warming Trends: A Flag for Antarctica, Lonely Hearts ‘Hot for Climate Change Activists,’ and How to Check Your Environmental Handprint
- Charleston's new International African American Museum turns site of trauma into site of triumph